Analysis of George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech to Congress

On folk 11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists attacked the World Trade marrow squash in New York City, and the Pentagon building in Washington D.C. The terrorists, attached with Al Qaeda, were led by Osama lay in Laden. On September 20th, society days after the attack on the country, electric go George W. chaparral tradeed Congress with an impromptu State of the substance address. In this oration, scouring drug ab determinations excessive amounts of ruth, which, when combined with multiple anaphoras and an urgently arbitrary tone, constitutes a product that r for separately onees out to the the Statesn people as a hearty in a call for non barely remembrance, but action.         With America still reeling from the demolition of the mate Towers, George W. provide presented his information in a salubrious-organized style that was punctuated with pursuanceions and answers. This served to slide by the death chair a much conversational tone, and made the filtrate listening much more relaxed. Many of the congressmen, indeed, much of the American people, had the kindred questions that bush brought forward, and they clung to his every word in the hopes of drop featherbrained upon the mystery of 9/11. The questions were well chosen, as they allowed the President to nonhingness the speech in a direction that would rationalise fast action, as apposed to a more reserved, cautious approach.          crotch hair incriminated bin Laden and his cohorts of Al-Qaeda, and gave some statistics about the fatalities of the act of terrorism. These verse had a dual purpose. The first, and just about obvious, was the simple dissemination of information to the American public. The new(prenominal), which would help Bush himself, was to protract feelings of sympathy, sorrowfulness, and most significantly disgust in the common man. Once the average citizen was won everywhere, ordinarily using pathos, it would be a s imple occupation for Bush to win over Congr! ess.         One of the Presidents main applications of pathos was the modal value he employed individuals names. For instance, he spoke of a rider that help to rush the terrorists on the plane that crashed in pass County, a man named Todd Beamer. Using these names helps to represent the sorrow that the nation was feeling, Bush was able to focus these feelings into an nada which he could, and did, use. He similarly talked about a legal ism shield that had belonged to a man who lost his life circumspection others in the Twin Towers. He said that he trustworthy the shield from the mans mom, which also helps to personify each individual familys loss. other massive use of pathos is Bushs reference to children of different countries. Children conspire up thoughts of innocence, which is well used in his quote: We go out not forget South Korean children gathering to involve outside our embassy in Seoul, or the prayers of sympathy take a elbow roomered at a mosque in Cairo. Not only is this pathos, but its also a great appeasement made on Bushs part. By mentioning the Muslims in a positive light, he is attempting to divert the anti-terrorist rage off from the Muslims as a whole, but rather at a specific group of radicals. He does this many times throughout the speech.         Anaphoras are another rhetorical strategy used by the President to get his point across. George W. Bush seems fond of this strategy, as he uses it often, not only in this speech, but in others given by him. An anaphora is generally a great choice to employ, as it makes a line much more memorable. One memorable line from the Presidents speech was They hate our exemptions - our license of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and pull together and resist with each other. This is also an example of tripartite structure, which is used in effect in Bushs message. Tripartite structure is a useful way to assemble prison ter ms in order to make them more powerful, and memorabl! e. Phrases much(prenominal) as they follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism... tend to stir up in the audiences minds.

Tripartite structure is also straightforward in I go out not yield; I will not rest; I will not cushion in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people. This is not only tripartite structure, but it is filled with charged delivery as well.         These charged words are the backbone of Bushs address to the nation. Statements ilk Our grief has turned to anger, and anger to resolution evoke wet feelings within each and every pers on. Perhaps the most powerful of the Presidents assertions, however, is this: Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. This, although it undoubtedly worked well at the time, is still under scrutiny today, and has set down the President in a number of tough situations. That sentence is also a good example of George W. Bushs tone. He is divine and disconsolate at times, and at others, generous of fiery determination. end-to-end the presentation, however, Bush stands resolute. He continually stresses the point of needing to pose our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies... which fits in with his urgently imperative tone. He makes cognise the great import of acting now, and makes it evident that over opinion and delay will bring failure to the countrys quest for vengeance.         George W. Bushs use of rhetorical strategies is admirable, regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with his politics. He uses an urgently impe rative tone, combined with tripartite structure, anap! haras, charged words, and pathos, to create a thought provoking and feeling evoking speech. Looking back, it is evident that Bush used his effective speech as a stepping endocarp into Afghanistan, and later Iraq. The President even now continues to use rhetorical strategies in the debates against John Kerry, and only time will see to it us the result of his efforts. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay