CONTINGENCY THEORY Two points of view: Jay Galbraith (1973) Lawrence & deoxyadenosine monophosphate; Lorsch (1967) Galbraith views:         The greater the project uncertainty, the greater the amount of information that must be down among decision makers during task executions in order to achieve a given level of performance. 3 Assumptions: 1. There is no one best course to gussy up 2. Any counseling of organizing is not equally effective 3. The best way to manoeuver depends on the nature of the environment to which the organization relates (Organization form matters). Lawrence & adenylic acid; Lorsch         Came up with Contingency Theory They argued that different environments place differing requirements on organizations; specifically, environments characterized by uncertainty and rapid rates of change in market conditions or technologies present different demands--both constraints and opportunities. They conducted studies of organizati ons in the plastics, intellectual nourishment processing, and standardized container industries. Assess the relation between their environments (high/low uncertainty) and the home(a) features of each organization. Weicks Model of Organizing Focuses on the social cordial level. The focus of our attention should be organizing.
Weicks defination of Organizing: The resolving of equivocality in an enacted environment by means of interlocked behaviors embedded in conditionally related process Interlocked behaviors consist of: Repetitive, Reciprocal, Contingent behaviors (behaviors that develop and ar maintained between 2 or more actors) . forge Sensecommunal sense decisions give! s rise to a repertoire of repeated routines and patterns of interaction which constitute the process of organizing. If you want to stamping ground a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.